


All magazines need to be distributed. Whether the creators of the magazine decide to publish the magazines themselves (self-publishing, often used with small businesses or groups of people who create their own magazine for fun). The other option would be to go with a well-known publishing institution. Some examples of well-known publishers would be “Bauer” and “ICP”.
Some advantages of using a well-known publisher would be this such as:
Exposure: Lots of readers/viewers would come from using a well-known publisher.
Tricks of the trade: Going through a large, well known publisher would also mean many other magazines have chosen this route before you. This would mean that they have learnt helpful tips and tricks which they could show you. The publishers will also know what the readers of your magazine would like (different stereotypes/sub-cultures would like different things, and read things differently). With self-publishing, it is purely trial and error.
Finding the funds: Small companies/self-publishers often find it quite hard to find the funding to keep their magazine running. This would result in not being able to expand their magazine, or get it out to a larger audience.
Music industry/interviewing: Large companies such as ICP and Bauer often have connections with large record labels or bands. This would make it easier for you to get into contact with anyone you want to interview, or for you to get any information you need. More connections will create a better magazine.
Some of the disadvantages of using a well-known publisher:
Ownership over the magazine: when using a large publisher, you may feel as if the ownership of the magazine has been taken away from you. This would be because some of the things you initially wanted to put in the magazine, are not allowed to be published largely. You may also feel as though you no longer own the magazine and cannot control it any longer.
I have chosen to use the company IPC to distribute my magazine. I have chosen this publisher over Bauer since Bauer already publish Kerrang (the same target audience, genre and style of magazine). This would make it less likely for them to think about publishing my magazine (which is still a lot smaller and less known than Kerrang is). I have chosen to use a well-known publisher for my magazine (even though I may feel a loss of control) because I will be able to expand the magazine to a larger audience and also create other products to work alongside my magazine easily. These would be things such as websites or blogs and radio stations. ICP also has a distribution deal with other companies such as W H Smiths (the UK’s largest magazine retailer).
A convention is something which sticks to the norm of the genre/stereotype/product etc. An example of a convention would be putting your socks on before your shoes. You could put socks on after your shoes, but you might not look right.
For this part of the course, I have created a punk/rock music magazine. I have selected magazines such as “Kerrang” and “NME” to influence my design.


Some of the more obvious conventions of a magazine cover would be the title (masthead), the large image behind all of the text (usually one large image, sometimes with smaller images layered on top), the date/issue line, a bar code, and any other cover lines. I have stuck to these conventions, aiming my magazine at a specific target audience (instantly creating a larger amount of viewers) rather than aiming my magazine at a completely new target audience (meaning not as many people would see it/read it). My design ended up being quite simple, with only three main colours used (red, black and white). This was inspired by NME since these are the main colours of their magazine. I have stuck to the conventions using only three main colours for my magazine, since most magazines don't use over 3/4 colours on the front cover of their magazine (since this would overwhelm the viewer and put them off reading it).